Wednesday, January 29, 2020

Security policies and alternatives Essay Example for Free

Security policies and alternatives Essay In light of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the United States has made several efforts to increase the country’s security. Within the last year, one of the largest debates has been with regard to border security. While the terrorist attacks are some of the fuel behind the debate, other issues include providing for the needs of illegal immigrants and their families and the economic impact of illegal immigration. Though in theory the debate centers on all American borders, the focus has been primarily on the southern border with Mexico and little discussion has been had about improving the security along the Canadian border. New border legislation enacted in 2006 provided for the building of a wall measuring several hundred feet long on the United States/ Mexico border in Texas, longer jail sentences for those convicted of smuggling illegal immigrants into the United States, and the posting of National Guard troops along the United States/Mexico border. A report in the September 21, 2006, edition of the Washington Post states that recent bills passed by the United States Congress regarding border security have all been somewhat weak, and have covered disparate aspects of border security that have little to do with each other. Little has been done to create laws that are both tactically strong in preventing illegal immigrants and terrorists from crossing the borders of the United States as well as providing laws that are fair and equal to those wishing to emigrate by legal means. Heightened interest in illegal immigration has led to more reporting of conflicts between Mexican Nationals and those charged with patrolling the border. These conflicts have simply added fuel to the cry for improved border security. Recent advances in technology have made it so that the United States can employ newer technology, ranging from facial recognition software to fingerprint readers in their effort to have more control over who enters the country via the southern border. Because the technology is complicated and new, many lawmakers are concerned about the potential invasion of privacy that it might cause, as well as the expense that it will entail. In addition, many who do not live in the Border States or are unfamiliar with American geography may have trouble envisioning both the length and scope of the American-Mexican border. Many policy makers have difficulties understanding the specific nature of the problems and therefore end up developing inadequate or poorly functioning solutions that don’t do anywhere near enough to resolve the problems created by these inadequate solutions. According to Ackleson (2005) one of the main issues in helping policy makers develop functional, efficient policies is the fact that very few people in power understand exactly what creates a situation where border security is both efficient and fair. One of the major complaints that have been made about current border security and immigration policy is that it does little to stop illegal immigrants, or potential terrorists from entering the country. Little has been done by the Federal Government to expand the rights of INS Border Patrol Agents to act in order to prevent illegals from entering the country. The National Guard presence on the border is minimal and nowhere near enough to patrol the thousands of miles of unprotected border. Another issue is that of the Untied States border with Canada. Several thousand miles of this border are completely unguarded, and in many places, people can simply walk into the United States from Canada. According to Mass (2007) one of the major issues is the influence of major corporations on the political agenda in the United States. This is most true regarding industries that rely almost completely on the flow of illegal immigrants. Fields such as agribusiness, and the service industry that includes multi-national corporations such as Con-Agra and McDonalds have all had issues in the past with the hiring of illegal immigrants, and many of these businesses have a powerful lobby in the U. S Congress. This lobby affects the ability of lawmakers to put more effective border security policies in place on the United States Mexico border. Mass (2007) also characterizes the current lack of border security as an effort by the government and the lobbies of major corporations that influence political policies to create a North American Union similar to the European Union. This may, or may not be true however, it is a strong possibility that this could happen since countries in Asia, the Middle East, and South and Central America are moving towards similar alliances. Many have proposed the idea that the border begins not just at the physical entry points to the United States but in places where people and cargo embark upon the journey to the United States. Problems with border security are not just related to Mexican and Canadian borders but with the entry of people and goods from Europe, Asia and the Middle East as well. The numbers are rather overwhelming given the fact that land based borders between the U. S and other nations are around 7,500 miles long, 95,000 miles of coastline, and over 500 million people to contend with. This means that we need to be doing much more than we are currently doing in order to protect our borders. Jennifer Lake (2007) of the Congressional Research Service states that we must focus on border security for two primary reasons. First, alternative solutions to border security must be addressed in order to protect the United States from terrorism. Second, something must be done in order to stem the flow of illegal immigration from Mexico, and Central and South America. We also do very little to limit or stop immigration from countries with large numbers of suspected terrorists, or to limit student and temporary work visas even further. Although President Bush proposes increasing the number of available temporary worker visas, some people argue that this is not a feasible solution since it could allow for the entrance of terrorists into the country. The potential problem is similar to an existing one: there is no enforcement to assure that people with temporary visas leave when their visas expire. Many proponents of increased border security argue that the United States must first enforce the current immigration laws on the books, including taking action against the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants already in the country. Many argue that until the current laws are enforced, adding more laws will simply be additional laws that illegal immigrants ignore. Desired Situation The key issues in border security are preventing terrorists from entering the country via weak borders and stemming the flow of illegal immigration from Mexico and South and Central America. Ideally, the objective would be for national security interests to be able to identify anyone who chooses to set foot on American soil. The overall goal would be to know who is entering the United States and for what purpose. Preventing Terrorism Preventing terrorism is one of the major issues that must be addressed when looking at border security. Since September 11, 2001 much has been done to ensure border security in this direction. However, there is still a great deal of work to be done. A. Airport Security: Enforcing federal guidelines regarding airport security is vital. Critics of the Transportation Safety administration say that the regulations are enforced differently at various airports across the country and that many airport security personnel are poorly trained and ineffective. In reality, this may currently be one of the most secure entry points into the United States and efforts need to be made to make the physical borders of the country as safe as the airports and harbors. B. Terrorist Acts. Regardless of public outcry over profiling, the U. S. Immigration and Naturalization Service needs to have more stringent control on the immigration of people from countries with high numbers of known or suspected terrorists. This could include more stringent background checks before visas are issued and a mechanism by which INS is alerted if a person with a temporary visa fails to leave the country on time. It might also be worth considering some sort of monitoring system so that persons of suspect origin can be monitored while in the United States on a temporary visa. Other things to consider are: 1. Limiting the number of available student, or temporary worker visas. Many of the 9-11 terrorists entered on these types of visas. Many of their visas were also expired. INS need to be authorized to do extensive pre-entry background checks on those requesting visas and needs to have an effective enforcement arm for deporting those who stay beyond the length of their visas. 2. Adequate supervision of immigrants coming in from the Canadian border; instead, we focus on the mass numbers coming in from Mexico. Both borders must be equally secure so that terrorists do not simply adapt to changing security issues. 3. Utilizing more of the advanced technology that has been developed in the wake of 9-11. Fingerprint readers and facial recognition software should be available at every legal port of entry into the United States. Stemming the Flow of Illegal Immigration An equally hot topic in the border security debate has been the issue of stemming the flow of illegal immigrants that cross the border from Mexico. Many of these immigrants cross the border where there are no security checkpoints and therefore federal security agencies have no way to monitor who might be entering the country. Opponents to the prospect of tightening border security have claimed that we need the illegal immigrants to take service sector and farming jobs American-born workers refuse to do. While this type of culturally-biased and bigoted rhetoric has no place in the immigration debate, the country does need to address employment needs as part of an overall immigration reform package. Additional proposals for increasing security on the southern border include: 1. Using a mix of enforcement officers to patrol the border, including INS, National Guard and U. S. Border patrol. 2. Empowering border patrol agents to act with impunity in protecting the borer. When a border patrol officer is convicted of attempted murder for firing at someone illegal crossing the border, there is a problem. 3. Border crossing stations on all roads, not just major highways. 4. Using biometric, and computerized border control methods 5. Extending walls between United States and Mexican borders, and making them much higher than they currently are. 6. Longer jail sentences for illegal immigrants and those who smuggle them into the country. 7. Encouraging economic growth and development in Mexico and South and Central America Evaluative Criteria In creating the desired solution, the United States has many issues to consider. These are very long borders and therefore will require a mixture of approaches and means of enforcement. Furthermore, to effectively reach the desired solution, the entirety of the political structure has to reach a consensus regarding the goals and outcomes desired. Currently, the two sides of the immigration debate cannot even agree on the desired outcome. Issues that will have to be considered are: 1. Can this solution be reached through political consensus? Because the political parties in the United States have been so diametrically opposed of late, there seems to be little chance that the parties will agree on a solution that is both politically expedient and effective in any manner. The one thing that might alter this is the public outcry last spring over the legislation that congressional leaders put forth. 2. Can this project be done in a cost-effective manner? With more than 7500 miles of borders to the north and the couth, the United States needs to make a major investment in border security and doing so requires selling the majority of the populace on the need for that security. 3. Do we have the technological capabilities for this solution? One proposal before Congress gave the INS one 24-hour period to determine if someone was eligible for a temporary visa into the United States. This restriction is ludicrous. Other countries often take months to determine if a person is eligible for a short term visa. 4. Can we justify this solution to ourselves and the world? America has long been considered the land of opportunity. If we take significant steps which effectively reduce the number of immigrants allowed into the country, are we betraying our past? 5. Does this solution address the need to grant political and religious asylum to persecuted peoples around the world and is it so cumbersome as to make legal immigration even more difficult? 6. Does this solution adequately address matters of national security such as knowing who is within our borders and when they leave? Current Situation Currently the United States is not going as far as it should in protecting our borders. We are still stuck in the frame of mind that assumes that border security involves merely the increase of manpower. This is not necessarily true. We have tools that can be utilized to both protect our borders, and to ensure that the system operates in an efficient and an effective manner. As of right now the United States has increased the Border Patrol run by the Immigration and Naturalization Service by several thousand employees. The Federal Government has also stationed several National Guard units along the U. S, Mexico border. They are doing little or nothing to protect the Canadian border. Through the Department of Homeland Security and the Transportation Security Administration, some entry into the united States has become more monitored and more difficult, but the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants already within our borders proves that country is not doing enough to protect itself from outside treats. Scenario One Jose and Rita live in Mexico near the border with El Paso. Rita is pregnant and Jose believes that he can find better employment in the United States. He applies legally for a temporary work permit, crosses the border daily for work and then applies as a legal immigrant. This is, of course, the best case scenario and the way it should work. If Jose attempts to get a temporary visa, the government should conduct an appropriate background check and issue the visa. He should be allowed to work in the United States and return to his native country to live. These day passes are a normal thing in border towns. The key issue here is that we must monitor to make sure they are leaving when the temporary pass expires. Scenario Two Juan and Carmelita want their unborn child to be born in America so that it will be an American citizen. After several days of observation, they find a spot in central Arizona along the fence where they can sneak into the United States. Carmelita’s child is automatically an American citizen because it was born in the United States. The problem here is that there are miles of unsecured border where illegals can sneak through and that we reward them for the effort by providing them with free medical care and free citizenship for their children. We need to develop a way to prevent illegal border crossing and to discourage its use. Scenario Three Terrorists observe the American border with Canada is largely unprotected and find ways to enter Canada. Then, they purchase hiking gear and backpacks and simply hike across the border into northern Minnesota. Homeland Security has no way of knowing they have entered the country and no way to protect the populace. The Canadian border is very rugged in some places and difficult to monitor. However, the border must be monitored to prevent terrorists from simply walking across it. ALTERNATIVES: Solution One Provide more border security by utilizing computer, and biometric technology as well as infrared cameras etc to monitor the flow of people in and out of the U. S/ Mexico and the U. S /Canada borders. Utilize these technologies to inspect cargo as well as people. A technological approach will be costly given the length of the borders and the terrain in some regions. In addition, there will need to be additional manpower to respond to threats detected by the technology and to monitor the machines reporting. Solution Two Decrease the number of work visas available for high tech, or medical fields (there are jobs in these fields but this is not where the majority of illegals work) and increase work visas for the service sector (this is where the majority of illegal immigrants work). In addition, the screening process before these visas are issued should be more extensive and the reporting requirements for employers should be more extensive as well. For example, if an employer hires a person with temporary work visa and that person suddenly stops coming to work, there should be a reporting mechanism within the INS so that his location and intentions within the country can be determined. Solution Three Increase the number of United States Customs Agents in airports, train stations at international borders, highways, and sea and river ports. Solution Four Reduce the number of services available to illegal immigrants even further than they are now. Currently they receive services for children born in the United States by making these unavailable there would be little motivation to sneak across the U. S border in order to receive them. Solution Five Offer aid to Mexico and Central and South American nations to help them raise the minimum wage rate, and attract new industries to Mexico. By improving the employment conditions in these countries we reduce the number of illegal immigrants crossing the borders. Make it conditional on governmental responsibility and fair distribution of funds. Stakeholders Defining who has a stake in the immigration debate is difficult as it includes all American citizens, Canadian and Mexican citizens and those wanting to immigrate to the United states from anywhere in the world. Among the largest stakeholders though are American politicians. Politicians are faced with an on-going crisis of national security unlike any they have ever faced before. Despite their best efforts, there is not simply a place or a person that the country can use as a military target and end the threat to national security. Instead, politicians are left with the requirement that they make the country feel safer and, if possible, be safer from external attacks. Politician’s further interest in the subject comes in the form of campaign donations and voting blocks. Many fear that if they are viewed as strong on immigration policy, they may lose voters among the Hispanic community and in other groups which believe that American opportunity should be available for everyone. On the other side of the coin, mostly Republican lawmakers are concerned about the big business interest in illegal immigration and do not want to offend the donors with big wallets. Caught in-between is the average American, Canadian or Mexican citizen. Many in border states grew up in a time when crossing the border was as easy as going into the next state. Many are mentally unprepared for the idea that Mexico and Canada really are sovereign countries and that a passport is required to visit them. Furthermore, people living in Border States have no desire to lose additional civil liberties in the name of security. Recommendations/Rationales American border security options have been criticized worldwide from countries which do far more to police their borders and regulate immigration than we ever have. Even Mexico, which has fence with concertina wire on its southern border, has argued that the United States should not protect itself from illegal border crossings. The people of America disagree. Middle America wants to feel safe from terrorist attacks and citizens in the Border States would like to feel that their jobs are secure from replacement with illegal immigrants. Unfortunately, with world criticism and a self-image based on the Statue of Liberty’s invitation to the â€Å"poor huddled masses yearning to be free†, it is difficult to find a solution that is both economically feasible and politically feasible. The best option is to increase physical security on the border including both personnel and technology. Building a wall is a fruitless and ridiculous idea that will waste valuable resource. Instead, we need to encourage the economies of Mexico and Central America while instituting serious enforcement of our border crossing laws. We also need to eliminate social welfare programs for illegal immigrants and restrict or eliminate auto-citizenship for newborns. Or, if we really do want to be the nation of immigrants we once were, we need to establish a new Ellis Island, in Texas or California, where people can line up and wait for their chance to swear allegiance to the United States and become citizens the right way. Success Indicators Perhaps it is the insidious nature of the problem, but measuring success of border security will be difficult. The largest measure of success is freedom from outside attack, but that is only one component of this issue. The further measure of success would be to see a decline in the number of illegal immigrants in the country and an increase in the number that are here legally. References Ackleson, Jason. Border security technologies: local and regional implications. The Review of Policy Research 22. 2 (March 2005): 137(19) Dizard, Wilson P. , III. DHS gets down to details on SBI: new technology plans include budget and staffing blueprints; cost put at nearly $8b. (Department of Homeland Security, Secure Border Initiative). Government Computer News 25. 34 (Dec 11, 2006): 1(2). I â€Å"House Passes Border Security Bill† Washington Post, September 21, 2006: http://www. washingtonpost. com Lake, Jennifer E. Border security: the complexity of the challenge. Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports and Issue Briefs. Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports and Issue Briefs, 2007. Mass, Warren. Why cant we secure the border? In truth, we can secure the border. The problem is that the federal government is pursuing an open-borders policy as a steppingstone to North American merger. (SPECIAL REPORT: ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION). The New American 23. 8 (April 16, 2007): 25(2). I

Monday, January 20, 2020

Henrik Isbens A Dolls House Essays -- A Dolls House Essays

1 A Dolls House   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  A Dolls House represents a women’s marital life from many years ago. The central theme of this play is Nora’’s rebellion against society and everything that was expected of her. Nora shows this by breaking away from all the standards and expectations her husband and society had set up for her. Women were not considered of importance to their husbands and that made women feel like in a â€Å"dolls house†, such as with Nora and her husband Helmer. In her time women were not supposed to be independent. They were to support their husbands, take care of the children, cook, clean, and make everything perfect around the house. Nora had two main rebellions; her taking out the loan, and when she left her family, and everything was all planned out by her. Nora’’s first rebellion was when she took out a loan so that she could pay for her husband, Torvald’s medical treatment. It was against the law for women to take out a loan without their husbands consent. When she did this she proved that she was not as submissive and helpless as Torvald thought she was. He called her â€Å"helpless†. A perfect example of Torvald’s control and Nora’s submissiveness was when she got him to re-teach her the tarantella. She already knew the dance but she acted as if she needed him to re-teach her the whole thing. When he says to her â€Å"Watching you swing and dance the tarantella makes my blood rush†. This shows that he is more interested in her physically than em...

Sunday, January 12, 2020

Butterfly Ballot’s Case

In general, ballot devices are used by the voters to record their choice of a leader. The ballot devices are placed in a polling station so that the voters can have the complete privacy for casting his or her vote without any disturbance. Initially the ballot papers were used by the voters during the elections that were conducted in Rome 139 BC. On the other hand, in North America the first time these paper ballots were used in the elections of 1629. The elections were conducted in the Massachusetts Bay Colony in order to select a new minister for the Salem Church.Another approach for the elections was used, the secret ballot. This method was first used in Australia in the early 1850s. The design of a ballot can assist or restrain precision in the elections. Poor or weak designs can result in misunderstanding and a certain level of chaos among the voting process in case a large quaintly of constituency members messes up or mismark a ballot. During the United States Presidential elect ions in the year of 2000, another new approach known as the confusing ballot or the butterfly ballot was utilized (Marcia Lausen, 2007).Butterfly Ballots: Before going into details of a butterfly ballot, it would be more appropriate to discuss briefly about ballots in common and particularly about the punch cards. As discussed earlier, ballot is a device or may be a system which is used by the voters to cast their vote in the favor of a particular person in the elections. Mostly, people have been bringing into play paper ballots of a range of varieties for reasonably a long time. Somewhere in the mid of the twentieth century, the punch card ballots were invented.A punch card ballots registers applicants and publishes with subsequent numbered symbols. With a use of a stylus, a hole is punched into the card all the way through the mark that is embedded on the card. This is how a punch card is used to cast a vote. A category of a punch card is known as the butterfly ballot. (Lausen, Ma rcia. 2007) The butterfly ballots are structured in a way that the candidates and the issues are published on both of the sides of the card. In the middle of the card, there is a single line which contains the numbered marks.In order to cast the vote, either of the corresponding mark of the candidate is punched. Now the issue with this kind of confusing design can be that in case if a voter is in a hurry or he is with a poor vision, the casted vote can be wasted or not counted due to any error in the punching. The subject of Butterfly ballot has been an intense issue is the past few years. This intense issue took place back in the year of 2000 in United States. The issue revolved around the elections that took place in Florida using the butterfly ballot.The main area of focus in this issue was the outcome that was determined using butterfly ballots i. e. the recent Presidential elections of that year along with the extensive accusations of mismarked secret ballots (Daniel H. Pink, 2 006). Structure of a Butterfly Ballot: The well-known butterfly ballot from Florida marked two sheets of Presidential nominees. The superior applicant on the initial page was Republican, and then came in the Democratic, most important individuals to consider that the equivalent subsequent hole must be utilized to mark your ballot for the Democrat.In actual fact, the subsequent hole matched up to a Reform gathering applicant (Pat Buchanan), who escorted the listing on the following page of the secret ballot. As an end result, a lot of individuals selected and marked for the incorrect candidate by mistake, or happening to punch and then comprehended their blunder, creating grounds for a dimpled vote or lynching chads which resulted in counting ballots easier said than done, in view of the fact that the purpose of the person on the electoral roll was not comprehensible (Matthew Justin Streb, 2008). The Florida Controversy:One of the major primary focuses of the Florida controversy is t he Palm Beach Country. In 1996, during the month of November, on 9th of the month, Thursday, a number of investigators from the camp of bush were of an impression that approximately a total of sixteen thousand (16,000) voters offensively and inappropriately casted their votes and punched their ballots. Later on the ballots were declined and canceled by the district officials. Later on similarly in the year of 2000, a calculated estimation of about nineteen thousand (19,000) voters punched their votes in a wrong manner (Keith Lewis Topper, 2005).According to the camp of Bush, there wasn’t s single authority that could have challenged the elections and the kind of ballots that were used in the voting of 1996. Even the format of ballots and elections of the year 2000 were not challenged by any official or any individual. They also claim that the self-governing commissioner signed off on the 2000 ballot. This practice is to some extent partially incorrect. A large quantity of ele ctorates articulated their apprehensions with the ballot of the year 2000. Election bureaucrats in point of fact disseminated a â€Å"word of warning† soon after that in the day.If we go years back, almost to the 1980s, in 1984, a similar dispute was brought up. According to some federal review, the system was reported to be defective and damaged in 1988. Considering all these issues that happened in the past with respect to the voting, on single question that still makes the nation think is that how is possible for a huge amount of people, approximately 35,000, to make the same illegal mistake of casting unauthorized votes and are left without even by the check of an official. The unusual design of the butterfly ballot came in with a number of controversies.Characteristically, a particular side of a punch card ballot includes together the applicants and concerns to be designated on and the openings for punching. In the circumstances of the butterfly ballot, the contenders we re stretched out transversely on two pages, and the openings for punching were centered in the center of the two page stretch. In speculation, arrows were theoretical to spot from each and every applicant to the equivalent opening which required being distinct, but small misfortunes of wrong or missed registrations possibly will reason the pointers to be not in proper alignment.This made the entire situation a challenging one in order to determine which the correct hole to be punched was. In Florida, butterfly ballots were not utilized from corner to corner of the state, and numerous detractors experientially said that they were exploited in conventionally Democratic areas, reasoning the determination outcome to be twisted, as Democratic electorates were nominated for the Reform applicant to a certain extent than the Democrat they considered they were choosing for.In view of the fact that the outline of the butterfly ballot privileged the Republican contender for President, lots of citizens pointed the finger at State of Florida of challenging to manipulate the ballot vote’s consequences. Whether or not these allegations were accurate is still to be resolute, the drawing has not been extensively employed ever since, as it was obviously too puzzling for supporters; countless districts also changed to electronic selection equipment, moderately than punch card ballots (James T. Patterson, 2005).The Consequences of the Butterfly Ballot Case: In Palm Beach Florida a lot of Democrats protested concerning the butterfly ballot being unsuitable and puzzling they accumulated a lawful confrontation in opposition to the outcome of 2000 US Presidential voting. Several of the Democrats incorrectly designated for Reformist Pat Buchanan when they proposed to choose for Democrat Al Gore because of the baffling drawing of the ballot document, lots of blemished the ballot paper even as properly casting their vote or exhausted their ballot.Democrats discovered out Gore mis placed 6,607 ballots when electorates stroked other than one person's name on the county's butterfly ballot. Astonishingly there was a huge quantity of ballots in support of Reformist Pat Buchanan. One more portion of disapproval from the Democrats was the secret ballot was created by Theresa LePore, who was as well administering the voting for Palm Beach County. The arrangement was just employed in the Palm Beach region and merely for Election Day election for President (Allan J. Lichtman, 2008). A number of voters for Gore voted for Pat Buchanan.This error was one of the major reasons for the success of President Bush by just a small margin. Even though registering a number of cases against this ballot by the Al Gore camp, they lost all the trials and were not able to prove that the election was an illegal one. After all this the Supreme Court sent out a numerous decisions saying that even if the election that took place was illegal, a new election cannot be proposed to take place in any case. This remark was given by considering the fact that there is no such rule or authority to any country to conduct one election after another.On the other hand, when this case was taken to the high court, an entirely opposite approach came in the view. This approach stated towards the case declining to remark on whether a revote may possibly be prearranged for the presidential determinations releasing the case on the justifications that the butterfly ballot was in considerable fulfillment with Florida’s Law. The superior obstacle further complicated to conquer for the judges was that presently there was no obvious preparation accessible intended for such circumstances even though if it accomplished that the poll was the rationale for bewilderment among the constituency.As a result of the erroneous design of the butterfly ballot, it was impossible to decide that who actually won the elections of the year 2000. In order to open the Pandora’s Box of election ch allenges there were reasons other than the unchangeable result of the elections that was caused by a simple confusing design of a ballot paper. The other major reason to open the Box was that there was no dependable technique of shaping any rational time limit for deciding on Florida’s member of the electorates the authentic intents of these supporters (J. David Woodard, 2006).Although the case of butterfly ballot was concluded without any treat to the camp of Gore, which indeed presented this case in a strict and legal manner. A certain amount of disappointment arose in the supporters of Gore, who went to the polling station with the intention to vote Gore and then fell victim to a simple design fault. They all were disheartened for the reason that the votes that they casted for Gore were never bothered to be registered. All this disappointment has always been an emotional state for the argument of Al Gore that in reality he really would have won the state of Florida.On the other hand the bush’s followers laid the blame on the Democrats of building political affairs elsewhere of election outcomes they didn't be fond of, cautioning the Democrats that if they required to turn over the early vote in Florida there were ample of new locations in the region of the nation now supporting Al Gore where parallel oppositions possibly will be elevated. Bush’s camp was not speeding up into objects as Al Gore camp supporters; they would declare themselves the victors on the foundation of the repeated recount and remain waiting the countdown did not ended.Later on, the supporters of Bush as well released doubts about the self-styled â€Å"butterfly ballot† in Palm Beach County, in which applicant’s given names became visible on whichever area of the ballot vote sheet, with holes representing hold up for them successively down the middle. Bush’s Camp stumbled off a listing of states and regions in the order of the country where they supposed consequences at present supporting Al Gore could still be terrified release to inquiry. The Bush camp talked about the sealed presidential outcomes in Iowa, Wisconsin and New Mexico.They as well said that truant votes still being calculated in a lot of divisions of the country could constrict the edge by which Al Gore is at present captivating the general accepted vote. The outline of the meeting by the Bush camp hoisted doubts of conflicts of abrasion in which the election procedure which was previously a cliffhanger with no convinced consequences could go on and on and weaken self-confidence in the entire progression. The New York Daily News gave a statement on November 1 that the Bush camp was building tactics to take control of the November 7th voting.Bush’s assistants were organizing to commence an anti-constitutional attempt to knock over Al Gore’s conquest if Bush accomplished something in winning the accepted vote (Benjamin E. Griffith, 2008). Conclusi on: The cause there were 35,000 canceled ballets and not a particular criticism is that electorate were uninformed they had created a mistake As a number of citizens take part in an election merely one time every four years, the need of knowledge with the process work to add to the fringe of mistake.The Supreme Court detained that the Florida Supreme Court's preparation for unfolding votes was illegal, as well as a 5-4 choice that ruined the Florida recount and permitted Florida to confirm its ballots. References Lausen, Marcia. 2007. Design for Democracy: Ballot and Election Design. Published by University of Chicago Press Pink, Daniel H. 2006. A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future. Published by Riverhead Books Streb, Matthew Justin. 2008. Rethinking American Electoral Democracy. Published by Taylor & Francis Topper, Keith Lewis. 2005.The Disorder of Political Inquiry. Published by Harvard University Press Patterson, James T. 2005. Restless Giant: The United Sta tes from Watergate To Bush V. Gore. Published by Oxford University Press US Lichtman, Allan J. 2008. The Keys to the White House: A Surefire Guide to Predicting the Next President. Published by Rowman & Littlefield Woodard, J. David. 2006. The America that Reagan Built. Published by Greenwood Publishing Group Griffith, Benjamin E. 2008. America Votes! A Guide to Modern Election Law and Voting Rights. Published by American Bar Association

Saturday, January 4, 2020

The Death Of Charles Manson - 2044 Words

Most people won’t remember that day because it never affected them, some people choose not to remember, and others†¦ others are still shaken by the events of that day. What makes that day so memorable? Was it because Charles Manson was on trial for the Helter Skelter murders, or Ronald Reagan beginning his second term as governor of California, and what about me? I was your average eight-year-old toe headed blond southern California boy, (a real charmer) just beginning his day. Like every other eight-year old boy living is southern California, I was still in bed that morning. RRRRRRRRRing, RRRRRRRRRing, RRRRRRRRRing, instinctively I reached over and flipped the little switch on the alarms top to the off position, thereby turning off the†¦show more content†¦Eyes heavy, wrapping my body tightly within my blankets much like a caterpillar as it is preparing its chrysalis, soon I would metamorphose into a superhero, villain, or whatever I could become in that euphoric transition from being conscious to sleep. Shortly after closing my eyes, reality became a nightmare. Imagine for a moment every firework on the fourth of July going off at once. Ears pierced by a violent shock wave, bed lifting off the floor, a feeling of momentary weightlessness as I was catapulted. like a race car being flung uncontrollably end over end before it scatters and disintegrates into a pile of twisted metal. No time to duck and cover, scream, or cry out in fear, blackness! Eyes struggled to open, the world around me blurry, dark, spinning. â€Å"Danny, Danny, are you alright?† I heard my mother ask frantically. Confused, startled, feeling like someone was trying to hammer a nail through my head, a warm and sticky fluid running down the side of my face, my eyes gradually converging on my surroundings. Still in shock laying silently on the floor, from my vantage I could see into the kitchen. On the floor in the center of the kitchen, laying on its side disemboweled, contents that should have been on the inside were strewn about the floor surrounding it. A grotesque sticky mess of entrails, leftovers from last night’s dinner. As if dead, it lay silent, still seeping fluids, milk and juice were still trickling down the side of its